.mobi Gets Sold Off

mTLD, the company set up by Nokia, 3, Google, Ericsson, Vodafone, Samsung, T-Mobile and other industry bigwigs to run the .mobi top-level domain is being purchased by another registrar responsible for such hits as the .info TLD. I was pretty skeptical of .mobi from the outset, and saw it as little more than a moneygrab, despite mTLD’s claims that all they were really trying to do was take the mobile web mainstream (something which, of course, really didn’t require its own top-level domain). The sale to another registrar would seem would seem to signal an end to the adventure, but it’s also a good time to reflect just how far the mobile web has come over the past five or so years. Saying the only way to move the mobile web forward is with a specific domain these days is a laughable concept. Of course, it was a laughable concept back then, too, but now plenty more people understand that.

Some good did come out of .mobi in the form of Mobiforge, its developer arm, which created a large number of resources for mobile web developers. A blog post there says business will carry on as usual. Hopefully that’s the case.

And in case you were wondering, my favorite .mobi site, flowers.mobi — you remember, the one that was purchased for $200,000 in 2006 and was supposed to be developed into a legit site with “relevant content” — is still just a parked domain with ads. And it’s still not compliant with .mobi’s rules for its sites. Big surprise there.

—–>Follow us on Twitter too: @russellbuckley and @caaarlo

Share this post:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Fred
    "What the .mobi haters and smear campaigners always conveniently forget is that there are new businesses and start ups that can't use the .com because it is already taken. I am talking generic keywords and non trademarked terms and names. Since the .com is not available and mobile internet is the future .mobi is perfect for them and many excellent names are available at a much lower pricetag then the .com if the .com is even available. They can even build a PC site on it that recognizes mobile devices if they like just like a .com
    The shortsightedness of some people as far as .mobi is concerned has always amazed me.
  • Franco
    Well .mobi was a valid proposal for how to help people find content suitable for phones - it wasn't a necessity, but a convenience - many such products are successfully marketed every day. But this one wasn't, despite the big backers. A real case study for business schools. What went wrong?

    Look at the management.

    These people were seriously stupid and out of control - after a big loss in 2007-2008 they did not cut expenses, yet income then fell by another 30% in 2008-2009. What were they expecting in 2008-2009??? A sudden boom in registrations or some huge auctions of reserved keywords? No chance. These people just thought if they sucked up to big business they'd get the 3m registrations or more they needed just to cover their fat expenses and they could ignore everyone.

    Seriously, think about it - the expenses were really big, what did they think would cover them? I really think they just assumed they would get a lot of registrations and use by big corps right from the start, then everyone else would just obediently follow. And when big registration numbers and use did by corps including their own so called "backers" did not happen, there was no plan B - they just covered up and ran it into the ground instead of trying something
    different. Losers.

    The idea of a company set up to promote the mobile web is laughable. Where is the company set up to promote the printed word, the internet, or the medium of television?
  • Does anybody know roughly how much the Irish company paid for .mobi rights?
  • I wasn't aware the dotMobi was getting sold/acquired. Interesting.

    Well, I too was and still am a believer that it is not the domain what should "determine" the rendering behavior of the specified host but rather the connecting device class. Because of this I was skeptical and kind of defensive when dotMobi was introduced.

    But a lot of good things came out from dotMobi and definitely it created a lot of awareness about mobile an "mobile web". I give a lot of credit to James and his vision; I believe he was sincere and in the end, it made a real impact. Today people know mobile and that dotMobi means mobile.

    I have the feeling .mobi is here to stay, and perhaps it should not be about "mobile content" (its original purpose), but "mobile institutions", similarly to how .com is about commercial and .net about network related or provider and edu about educational institutions.

    ceo
  • I wouldn't call it a charade. Lots of companies and bodies have tried all sorts of ways to promote mobile and its technologies. This was just another, and I believe it was sincere.

    Using the domain as promotion for the new medium is not a bad idea - after all, the colloquial understanding of .com correlated strongly with the take off of the original web.

    (And today's host of developer competitions to build out 'open' app stores... think those are any more altruistic?)

    Maybe I was hoodwinked - but I seriously doubt it. Personally I felt dotMobi had a unique opportunity to harness commitment from mobile industry (and domain) investors - and stimulate the knowledge and enthusiasm amongst site owners and technologists that mobile needs.

    To wit, mobiForge, DeviceAtlas, Mowser, ready.mobi etc etc. Because of their influence, I hope these initiatives all continue in one form or another.

    So in many ways, dotMobi has played a part in the germination of the mobile web. Whatever you think of flowers.mobi, I think the company can claim its original mission more or less accomplished.

    [Anti-disclaimer: I have no continuing interest in the company whatsoever ;-) ]
blog comments powered by Disqus