Survivors Returns

Back in the Summer of ’07, I wrote this post, which (among other things) speculated about how we were getting very dependent on technology generally. And if something were to happen, which resulted in us no longer having access to technology, we’d be well and truly scuppered.

I also wrote that this was the theme of the old BBC series Survivors, which I could just about remember being broadcast back in the 70′s, so powerful was the concept and execution. The idea behind the programme, written by Terry Nation (who also wrote the original Dr Who), was that 99% of humanity is wiped out by some virus, meaning that the survivors had to start all over again.

The problem is that after a phase of scavenging from the old society, they have to carry on with what they can make themselves and that in a society where everyone ahd become a specialist, lots of the skills necessary for “civilization” had simply been lost. I mean, could you create electricity, make a lightbulb or build a basic PC from scratch? Could you even light a fire and cook a meal without modern technology?

I’d delighted to say the the good old Beeb has re-made the series (I’m guessing that they must have commissioned it about the same time as I wrote my original post). The first showing pitched in with 6.5m viewers – very respectable as all the country’s morons were busy watching “I’m a Celebrity….” at the time.

The new series sounds pretty different in terms of plotline and I assume they’ve updated all those dodgy kipper ties and flares in the original. But the main themes, such as communes vs warlords remain in tact, as well as the central concept of what life would be like in a post-apocalyptic world.

But my original point behind the post remains. With so much information on PCs and the web (exclusively in many cases), such an horrific scenario caused by a devastating computer or human virus, or even nuclear war or asteroid collision, would in many ways be worse today than 40 years ago. And it’ll be many times worse in 40 years again.

So what exactly is mankind’s backup plan? Exactly how would we recover as a dominant species, especially now that the “easy” energy sources such as coal and oil have largely been consumed? It would be like trying to leap from the bronze age straight to nuclear power and this would very likely just wipe us out.

Ho hum.

—–>Follow us on Twitter too: @russellbuckley and @caaarlo

Share this post:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Reddit

Tags: , ,

  • Owen Jacobs
    "I mean, could you create electricity, make a lightbulb or build a basic PC from scratch?

    None of that's needed anyway. What's wrong with writing notes and making calculations on a piece of paper anyway? We all do that _despite_ the fact that we don't need to. Of the things mentioned, having no light during evenings (and hence not being effective during that time) might be the worst problem.

    What human beings need to survive is food and shelter. That's all. Sure, we "elderly" would have troubles (out of habit), but the next generation wouldn't. Even so, starvation, criminality and migrations would be some of the problems humanity would face.

    Slightly out of context, but many seem to think of technical change always going forward. Look at two clear examples of technology evolution going backwards because it provides other advantages countering that:
    - Texting on a mobile phone is clearly "low tech" compared to the same on a PC, yet as you carry the phone with you, you can text anywhere.
    - Digital music is (still, even though there's no reason to) sold in formats with sub par audio quality, yet the convenience is so much greater that you download and listen to crappy MP3s anyway.
    Not implying that this in any way would be similar to losing all forms of societal structure and packaged energy sources, just that human beings are genetically designed to adapt, whether we talk evolution or de-evolution.

    Surely, a lot of geeks would have nothing to do, as their competences would not be needed, and they don't get laid anyway, so they would soon disappear from the gene pool. Or maybe not. I wonder how the "geek gene" could survive throughout the ages, but it has. Is it one of those recessive genes that pop up now and then even though it's useless without computers around? Kind of like tardigrades that can survive droughts (and even the cold of space) for a long time but will spring up as soon as they are fed water. Just kidding, or...
  • Absolutely. See also the other seventies TV film "Threads", with the same theme and which was even more realistically frightening and worrying......
blog comments powered by Disqus