I just read about a new service on SlashDot, which sounds like it might be pretty useful, although I find the positioning strange - maybe a cultural thing.
The service is called SlyDial and you use it to connect you straight to someone’s voice mail, when you don’t want to speak to them in person. To use the service, you dial 267-SLYDIAL (267-759-3425) and after the prompt, dial the person’s mobile number for whom you want to leave a message. This call then goes straight through to their voice mail, without ringing the phone itself - although one SlashDotee claims that it makes the phone ring once. I can’t try it out as it only works in the US, so any feedback would be cool.
The service is ad-funded, with callers having to listen to an ad before getting connected to the voicemail, with an option to upgrade to a paid-for version at 15 cents a call or $4.95 per month for unlimited use.
As far as the positioning is concerned, I find it a little strange that it’s about “sly”, which in British English implies that it’s sneaky or underhand in some way, unlike say, “cunning”, which has a similar meaning, albeit with slightly more admirable qualities. And many of the use-cases that they suggest do indeed sound “sly”, such as a student phoning home but not wanting to actually talk to their parents, or when someone has blown $5,000 gambling and wants to tell their wife to hold off making a mortgage payment!
To me, this is a little like a credit card company promoting itself by suggesting that it makes it easier for you to buy online porn or carry on drinking yourself stupid when you run out of cash. Yes, these are true and many people do use credit cards for these kinds of purposes. But why sully the image of the service for more mainstream users? Human nature will ensure that every nefarious use for a product and service will be discovered and spread virally anyway. I’m sure that bank note issuers didn’t think about how their product could be used to consume cocaine or hammer manufacturers anticipate that they were making murder weapons for some people.
There are other use-cases they go into and arguably far better and surely more realistic examples of how it might be used - such as not wanting to bother someone with a call, but wanting to make sure they get a message, such as confirming a meeting. Personally, I’d do it by email the day before, but there are certainly some people who prefer voicemails, especially in corporate America.
So, while I can see that for some people this kind of service might be interesting some of the time, I do wonder about the marketing and execution. Or maybe I’m being too straight and serious today. What do you think?
As with all these sorts of service though, the biggest challenge is in promoting itself. Getting the word out in the first place is about 5% of the battle. Getting people to use it again and again is the huge challenge, as they must remember that it exists at all when they have a potential need for it and then remember how to use it - or the phone number in this case. These aspects are really, really hard.
I wish them all the best, of course, despite my slight reservations.





isn’t sending someone an MMS with a voice recording easier or am i missing the point?
Stefan - I think it comes down to cost and usability.
An MMS would cost more that this.
And for the vast majority of MMS users (which isn’t the vast majority of phone users by any means), MMS is about sending photos. I think you’d need to be a real power user to think in these terms and then use MMS like that.
I appreciate that it’s not that hard, but then I wrote a book on MMS back in the day (and far too early). But this is way off most people’s understanding of what MMS does, let alone how to do it when they do realise.
On the other hand, assuming you remember about SlyDial in the first place and remember their number and then remember your friend’s number (because it’s in your address book, which you can’t access as you’re on the phone and who remembers numbers these days?), most would agree that it’s easier than an embedded MMS.
And calling, emailing or sending an sms is easier still.
Russell
why not send a txt message if you dont want to talk to the person?
I can see a market for this kind of service for those on-the-go, and of a generation with challenged dexterity, who might normally try sending an sms, but would rather speak the message without getting into a protracted conversation.
If you could link the service to the address book and click to dial, I think it would get good uptake. This might need cleverer partnering models with operators.
Vodafone UK has offered this service for a while if you’re calling from another Vodafone phone (unless it’s stopped it recently - I’ve not checked). Add 121 to the front of the Vodafone mobile number when you call the other person…
Thanks Mark - but like all these things, it has to work cross-operator to have any chance of succeeding.
Russell