<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Quaint: T-Mobile USA Gets Into The Landline Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/02/21/how-quaint-t-mobile-usa-gets-into-the-landline-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/02/21/how-quaint-t-mobile-usa-gets-into-the-landline-business/</link>
	<description>Russell Buckley and Carlo Longino on mobile technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:31:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carlo Longino</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/02/21/how-quaint-t-mobile-usa-gets-into-the-landline-business/comment-page-1/#comment-118783</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo Longino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/02/21/how-quaint-t-mobile-usa-gets-into-the-landline-business/#comment-118783</guid>
		<description>Hi Dean,

I think you&#039;re probably right, that I have overstated things a bit. I was thinking about this some more over the weekend. There is a clear trend of fixed-to-mobile substitution among younger people -- but what happens when those people grow up and have small children, for instance? Do you revert back and get a fixed-line family phone at the house? What about kids who have grown up with mobiles, will they ever see a need to get a fixed line at home? Or what&#039;s the alternative -- shared mobiles, or fixed terminals that use the mobile network?

Indeed, as you cite, there are plenty of cases where a fixed-line makes sense, particularly in business. I think I could have worded things better, perhaps, to say the days of old-styled copper landlines are numbered. But with prices dropping so far so fast, it&#039;s clear that the fixed-line phone business, especially the residential business, is in for some serious disruption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dean,</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re probably right, that I have overstated things a bit. I was thinking about this some more over the weekend. There is a clear trend of fixed-to-mobile substitution among younger people &#8212; but what happens when those people grow up and have small children, for instance? Do you revert back and get a fixed-line family phone at the house? What about kids who have grown up with mobiles, will they ever see a need to get a fixed line at home? Or what&#8217;s the alternative &#8212; shared mobiles, or fixed terminals that use the mobile network?</p>
<p>Indeed, as you cite, there are plenty of cases where a fixed-line makes sense, particularly in business. I think I could have worded things better, perhaps, to say the days of old-styled copper landlines are numbered. But with prices dropping so far so fast, it&#8217;s clear that the fixed-line phone business, especially the residential business, is in for some serious disruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Brown</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/02/21/how-quaint-t-mobile-usa-gets-into-the-landline-business/comment-page-1/#comment-118771</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/02/21/how-quaint-t-mobile-usa-gets-into-the-landline-business/#comment-118771</guid>
		<description>You still need a home number, so people can call your house/family instead of just you. With only mobile numbers, communication gets atomized. It&#039;s good to call someone&#039;s house and have their partner/friend/kids pick-up... then you get to say hello to them as well.

My wife won&#039;t let me cancel the house phone, even though it doesn&#039;t get used much. It&#039;s re-assuring to her that we have it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You still need a home number, so people can call your house/family instead of just you. With only mobile numbers, communication gets atomized. It&#8217;s good to call someone&#8217;s house and have their partner/friend/kids pick-up&#8230; then you get to say hello to them as well.</p>
<p>My wife won&#8217;t let me cancel the house phone, even though it doesn&#8217;t get used much. It&#8217;s re-assuring to her that we have it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Bubley</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/02/21/how-quaint-t-mobile-usa-gets-into-the-landline-business/comment-page-1/#comment-118767</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Bubley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/02/21/how-quaint-t-mobile-usa-gets-into-the-landline-business/#comment-118767</guid>
		<description>Hi Carlo

Interesting. It&#039;s only really the US (OK &amp; Finland) that take a sort of philosophical view that &quot;cutting the cord&quot; is somehow the way of the future.

I&#039;m seeing an increasing realisation that actually fixed-line telephony (or more importantly fixed VoIP) has a permanent role in many contexts. It has different use cases, different psychological connotations and I cannot see it disappearing, especially in countries outside the US where fixed &amp; mobile numbers are visibly different.

In particular, there is a strong rationale for places having numbers, as well as people. I really don&#039;t want the cellphone number of the guy who cooks pizza, I just want the number of the pizza store itself.

Dean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Carlo</p>
<p>Interesting. It&#8217;s only really the US (OK &amp; Finland) that take a sort of philosophical view that &#8220;cutting the cord&#8221; is somehow the way of the future.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m seeing an increasing realisation that actually fixed-line telephony (or more importantly fixed VoIP) has a permanent role in many contexts. It has different use cases, different psychological connotations and I cannot see it disappearing, especially in countries outside the US where fixed &amp; mobile numbers are visibly different.</p>
<p>In particular, there is a strong rationale for places having numbers, as well as people. I really don&#8217;t want the cellphone number of the guy who cooks pizza, I just want the number of the pizza store itself.</p>
<p>Dean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/02/21/how-quaint-t-mobile-usa-gets-into-the-landline-business/comment-page-1/#comment-118746</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/02/21/how-quaint-t-mobile-usa-gets-into-the-landline-business/#comment-118746</guid>
		<description>I would also take the plunge, add hotspot wifi service and get a wifi phone as well... Right now I&#039;m sitting on the fence debating if I should hotspot or iPhone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also take the plunge, add hotspot wifi service and get a wifi phone as well&#8230; Right now I&#8217;m sitting on the fence debating if I should hotspot or iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
