Privacy Really Is Raising Its Head

Back when I was doing my predictions for the year, I forecast that “privacy” would be the word of the year, alongside Carlo’s prediction of “Open”. And the first few months of 2008 seem to be bearing this out, whether it’s a story about another load of confidential data being stolen or lost, or watchdogs pointing out the dangers.

There’s an article in The International Herald Tribune yesterday, which neatly summarises the current state of thinking in the mobile business. And if it’s in the IHT, it’s mainstream thinking and not restricted to a few geeks and bloggers.

The stimulus for the article seems to be Wang Jianzhou, the chief executive of China Mobile, breaking the Omerta of the mobile industry by pointing out the elephant sitting fatly in the room full of leading business people and politicians

“We know who you are, but also where you are,”

he said about location-based advertising

In a country like China, I’m sure this had many of the audience feeling very uncomfortable indeed. He could have added that they also know what you say and sms too, if he’d want to really emphasise the “knowledge is power” mantra.

I think that the privacy battle will come to a head over location based services, mainly because most people get a little freaked about having their movements tracked by corporations and governments alike.

How long will it be before politicians or regulators start trying to get involved?

—–>Follow us on Twitter too: @russellbuckley and @caaarlo

Share this post:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Reddit
  • As we talk about privacy, should we also be aware of Detroit Mayor, Kwame Kilpatrick, and his chief of staff? Here is where they had an intimate relationship and discussed such over SMS...using the mobile devices provided to them by the city, their employer.

    As it turns out, the city contracts with a specialized service to handle the wireless communications between city officials where every conversation/transaction is tracked and recorded. This is, we are told, to protect the city from potential liability.

    Move forward, affair takes place, and all communications between these two are made public. All language was made public.

    Talk about some scary scenarios involving privacy, this one leaps right to the front.

    Can we expect privacy while using our employers communication tools, including mobile devices and PCs?
  • Russell, this is why zone detection (see my post at http://blog.andrewgrill.com/bl... ) will become accepted by consumers.

    In this scenario, the exact location of the user is never revealed, only if they are "in the zone" of a pre-defined area and opted in.

    If they are not in the zone, their location/zone will be returned as a zero - ie not in any zones.

    I think this will be more acceptable to consumers as they will have some control in opting in/out of the zones AND the campaign servers only need to deliver inventory when they are in the zone and not in between.

    I'll be detailing the zone detection concept in much more detail very soon over on www.msearchgroove.com in a guest post on the topic.

    Andrew Grill
blog comments powered by Disqus