Another Glorious Example Of Customer Service

A Canadian oil worker managed to run up an $85,000 phone bill with Bell Mobility after erroneously thinking he could use his handset, and its $10 unlimited internet plan, as modem for his computer. We’ve seen this sort of story before, dating back to Joi Ito’s GPRS roaming bill in 2004, and more recently with plenty of iPhone users who are now familiar with international roaming charges.

On the one hand, people should make themselves familiar with their tariff. On the other, operators don’t generally do a great job of making that very easy. Indeed, the guy in this case says, “I told them I wasn’t aware I would be charged for hooking up my phone to the computer.” Whether that’s his own fault or the operator’s is somewhat irrelevant — the real issue is that they never bothered to let him know he was running up a huge bill.

It seems like it would be pretty easy to have a system that sends the user a text message when they incur a certain amount of charges — indeed, some operators offer such a feature. This is useful not just for people who aren’t aware of the details of their plan, but in the case of fraud as well. Whatever the small cost of such a system would undoubtedly be saved by helping to prevent the PR damage from these sorts of stories.

Bell Mobility has been kind enough to lower the bill to $3,243 — the equivalent amount of charges on the best data plan that allows tethering — as a “goodwill gesture”. Again, on the one hand, the charges are legitimate, as the guy isn’t arguing that he used the phone as a modem. But on the other, a little proactivity from Bell Mobility could have saved them this PR mess, since the media has a voracious appetite for these tales. But, I guess they figure all that damage will only cost them $3,243, so it’s worth it.

Update: Tarek pointed out a part of the article I skipped over:

“The thing is, they’ve cut my phone off for being like $100 over,” he told CBC News. “Here, I’m $85,000 over and nobody bothered to give me a call and tell me what was going on.”

That makes it even more galling. If they can do it for voice, why not for data?

—–>Follow us on Twitter too: @russellbuckley and @caaarlo

Share this post:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Tomi Ahonen
    Hi Carlo and all readers of MobHappy

    Great posting. The story keeps spreading (saw it on BBC 24 hour world news channel last night). I blogged about it at www.communities-dominate.blogs... and I also posted about it at Forum Oxford.

    Its an appalingly bad case of customer "service" by Bell Canada and obviously by now their total damage to their "customer service" brand has been countless times greater than the total impact of that 85,000 dollar charge or its 3,400 dollar reduced amount..

    It just shows how bad the mobile telecoms industry still is at customer orientation. Mistakes like this. But also, we all (bloggers in this space) need to spread these stories of mistakes, so that the mobile operators learn what is acceptable and what is not. Learning by making mistakes, yes, but they are the last vestiges of an industry that is still not customer-oriented...

    Great posting Carlo (as per usual)

    Tomi Ahonen :-)
  • > If they can do it for voice, why not for data?

    NOT an excuse, just information: Sprint, for one, cannot tell what data usage is until the bill is cut. There's no (really) good reason for this, its just one of those "we're a 125 year old phone company at the core" sorts of things.

    The lack of caring what customers think or need is what keeps this sort of technical issue floating about for years.
blog comments powered by Disqus