<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ad-Funding Whinge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/07/24/ad-funding-whinge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/07/24/ad-funding-whinge/</link>
	<description>Russell Buckley and Carlo Longino on mobile technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Buckley</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/07/24/ad-funding-whinge/comment-page-1/#comment-110449</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/07/24/ad-funding-whinge/#comment-110449</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m sorry if you think it&#039;s inaccurate, but I have quoted my source and I haven&#039;t in any way misrepresented what they reported you said in their article &quot;Ad-funded model comes under question&quot;, the focus of which is primarily about your speech.

And sorry to be dim, but would you mind expanding on your point about iPhone and Blyk? I&#039;m really not sure what you&#039;re trying to illustrate.

Russell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m sorry if you think it&#8217;s inaccurate, but I have quoted my source and I haven&#8217;t in any way misrepresented what they reported you said in their article &#8220;Ad-funded model comes under question&#8221;, the focus of which is primarily about your speech.</p>
<p>And sorry to be dim, but would you mind expanding on your point about iPhone and Blyk? I&#8217;m really not sure what you&#8217;re trying to illustrate.</p>
<p>Russell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oz Eleonora</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/07/24/ad-funding-whinge/comment-page-1/#comment-110367</link>
		<dc:creator>Oz Eleonora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/07/24/ad-funding-whinge/#comment-110367</guid>
		<description>Interesting take on what I said, albeit inaccurate. I never said I was against mobile advertising at all. In fact, what I said was that advertising in the mobile market, moreso than in any other market, has to be relevant to the particular user receiving it. This requires a lot more than the blanket level &#039;segmentation&#039; that is going on today.

Regarding business models, perhaps an illustration of my point would become clear if you try to answer the following question: &quot;If a Blyk &#039;subscriber&#039; had an iPhone, how would Blyk make money?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take on what I said, albeit inaccurate. I never said I was against mobile advertising at all. In fact, what I said was that advertising in the mobile market, moreso than in any other market, has to be relevant to the particular user receiving it. This requires a lot more than the blanket level &#8216;segmentation&#8217; that is going on today.</p>
<p>Regarding business models, perhaps an illustration of my point would become clear if you try to answer the following question: &#8220;If a Blyk &#8216;subscriber&#8217; had an iPhone, how would Blyk make money?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

