<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast Advertising is Truly Awful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/</link>
	<description>Russell Buckley and Carlo Longino on mobile technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podonomics</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/comment-page-1/#comment-100723</link>
		<dc:creator>Podonomics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/#comment-100723</guid>
		<description>[...] As I continue to interview podcasters for my book Podcasting for Profit, I&#8217;m discovering more and more that advertising and sponsorship can work in a podcast (although some do think they&#8217;re truly awful). So, it&#8217;s not surprising that eMarketer would release a report saying that spending on podcast advertising will reach $400-million by 2011. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I continue to interview podcasters for my book Podcasting for Profit, I&#8217;m discovering more and more that advertising and sponsorship can work in a podcast (although some do think they&#8217;re truly awful). So, it&#8217;s not surprising that eMarketer would release a report saying that spending on podcast advertising will reach $400-million by 2011. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klaus</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/comment-page-1/#comment-100719</link>
		<dc:creator>Klaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/#comment-100719</guid>
		<description>The way Jason talks about his sponsors gives the listener the impression that it is irony and that he is just joking. I doubt that this is any good for the sponsors.

But the worst of all is Adam Curry, he made his podcast an adcast and is mixing content with advertising - very bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way Jason talks about his sponsors gives the listener the impression that it is irony and that he is just joking. I doubt that this is any good for the sponsors.</p>
<p>But the worst of all is Adam Curry, he made his podcast an adcast and is mixing content with advertising &#8211; very bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Buckley</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/comment-page-1/#comment-100716</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/#comment-100716</guid>
		<description>Ken - thanks for the comment and it&#039;s fine to disagree :-)

My concern here is primarily to stimulate debate on what would make the ads better. Because better = more effective = happy advertisers = rich Cameron. And the converse holds true that ads that aren&#039;t working because everyone skips them, means that advertisers stop (or don&#039;t start in the first place).

I totally agree that the length of the ads isn&#039;t a problem and in comparison with other media, Podcasts offer exceptional value. But I&#039;d also argue that this is the wrong mindset. In this day and age, we shouldn&#039;t be looking at ads as something we &quot;have to&quot; consume, but something that we&#039;re happy to consume. Maybe they entertain us somehow. Or give us useful information. Or a special offer that interests us. Or an ad that truly engages us.

I don&#039;t pretend to be an Advertising Creative. But personally, I&#039;d far prefer to listen to Cam saying something along the lines of &quot;And here&#039;s today&#039;s interesting fact bought to you by our sponsors XYZ. Did you know that the most dangerous animal that ever lived is the mosquito, which is estimated to have killed about half the people who ever lived.&quot; Obviously that would need to change for every show :-) but it seems to me to be far more in tune with the G&#039;day World Podcast than talking about saving 10% off a domain name.

I&#039;m not suggesting that this is the solution, but something along those lines would surely be more preferable to an ad that you hear once and then skip.

Russell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken &#8211; thanks for the comment and it&#8217;s fine to disagree <img src='http://mobhappy.com/blog1/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My concern here is primarily to stimulate debate on what would make the ads better. Because better = more effective = happy advertisers = rich Cameron. And the converse holds true that ads that aren&#8217;t working because everyone skips them, means that advertisers stop (or don&#8217;t start in the first place).</p>
<p>I totally agree that the length of the ads isn&#8217;t a problem and in comparison with other media, Podcasts offer exceptional value. But I&#8217;d also argue that this is the wrong mindset. In this day and age, we shouldn&#8217;t be looking at ads as something we &#8220;have to&#8221; consume, but something that we&#8217;re happy to consume. Maybe they entertain us somehow. Or give us useful information. Or a special offer that interests us. Or an ad that truly engages us.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t pretend to be an Advertising Creative. But personally, I&#8217;d far prefer to listen to Cam saying something along the lines of &#8220;And here&#8217;s today&#8217;s interesting fact bought to you by our sponsors XYZ. Did you know that the most dangerous animal that ever lived is the mosquito, which is estimated to have killed about half the people who ever lived.&#8221; Obviously that would need to change for every show <img src='http://mobhappy.com/blog1/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  but it seems to me to be far more in tune with the G&#8217;day World Podcast than talking about saving 10% off a domain name.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not suggesting that this is the solution, but something along those lines would surely be more preferable to an ad that you hear once and then skip.</p>
<p>Russell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/comment-page-1/#comment-100711</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 01:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/#comment-100711</guid>
		<description>Hey Russell:

First off; thoughtful post, I swear! I&#039;m gonna disagree with it, but that doesn&#039;t make it uninteresting.
 
I came her from Cameron&#039;s post on the same subject, and I left a longer post there (hm...not so much longer, in retrospect. LOL)...but my quick response would be that I think &quot;truly awful&quot; is a bit much. I checked Cameron&#039;s most recent long ad (#209)...it was a 30 second intro for another TPN show, and then about a 40 second ad for the Giant Domain Name Retailer We Shall Not Name. Then an hour long podcast. I can TOTALLY live with that. Heck..if you&#039;re in agreement that advertising is going to pay for these things, how else do you think it&#039;s going to work? *grin* I&#039;m amazed that we get as upset as we do over a couple of minutes an hour. C&#039;mon!!

Sure, we can imagine the &quot;insert a totally customized ad&quot; fest in the future. OTOH, I&#039;m making this comment in a TEXTAREA on your blog that has a &quot;Unlimited Calls Service for Filipinos&quot; ad below it (just for me!)...so maybe that won&#039;t go quite as well as we expect. *grin* (for the record: nothing _wrong_ with said Filipino call service in general, but it&#039;s absolutely useless to me!)

And specialized podcast ad production houses? That sounds like the beginning of re-intermediating the middlemen that we just got excited over disintermediating! *sigh*

&quot;Something we gotta live with for now&quot;...sure. &quot;Truly awful&quot;? I don&#039;t think so. Go back and listen to terrestrial radio again...you&#039;ll remember what Truly Awful really sounds like.

Note: Don&#039;t take this the wrong way...I realize you&#039;re just thinking out loud here. I just wanted to toss my two cents in the bucket!! Vive la podcast!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Russell:</p>
<p>First off; thoughtful post, I swear! I&#8217;m gonna disagree with it, but that doesn&#8217;t make it uninteresting.</p>
<p>I came her from Cameron&#8217;s post on the same subject, and I left a longer post there (hm&#8230;not so much longer, in retrospect. LOL)&#8230;but my quick response would be that I think &#8220;truly awful&#8221; is a bit much. I checked Cameron&#8217;s most recent long ad (#209)&#8230;it was a 30 second intro for another TPN show, and then about a 40 second ad for the Giant Domain Name Retailer We Shall Not Name. Then an hour long podcast. I can TOTALLY live with that. Heck..if you&#8217;re in agreement that advertising is going to pay for these things, how else do you think it&#8217;s going to work? *grin* I&#8217;m amazed that we get as upset as we do over a couple of minutes an hour. C&#8217;mon!!</p>
<p>Sure, we can imagine the &#8220;insert a totally customized ad&#8221; fest in the future. OTOH, I&#8217;m making this comment in a TEXTAREA on your blog that has a &#8220;Unlimited Calls Service for Filipinos&#8221; ad below it (just for me!)&#8230;so maybe that won&#8217;t go quite as well as we expect. *grin* (for the record: nothing _wrong_ with said Filipino call service in general, but it&#8217;s absolutely useless to me!)</p>
<p>And specialized podcast ad production houses? That sounds like the beginning of re-intermediating the middlemen that we just got excited over disintermediating! *sigh*</p>
<p>&#8220;Something we gotta live with for now&#8221;&#8230;sure. &#8220;Truly awful&#8221;? I don&#8217;t think so. Go back and listen to terrestrial radio again&#8230;you&#8217;ll remember what Truly Awful really sounds like.</p>
<p>Note: Don&#8217;t take this the wrong way&#8230;I realize you&#8217;re just thinking out loud here. I just wanted to toss my two cents in the bucket!! Vive la podcast!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Buckley</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/comment-page-1/#comment-100710</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/#comment-100710</guid>
		<description>Cameron, mate, thanks for stopping by and really sorry to be the one who breaks it to you?
I mean you have a great Podcast? As I said above? But the fact is that Aussies tend to talk as if they&#039;re asking questions? Even though they&#039;re making statements? And questions tend to go up at the end of the sentence?

Ok, admittedly your dulcet tones tend to be more neutral than most and you have a great &quot;radio&quot; voice. But.....?

Heh heh.

Russell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameron, mate, thanks for stopping by and really sorry to be the one who breaks it to you?<br />
I mean you have a great Podcast? As I said above? But the fact is that Aussies tend to talk as if they&#8217;re asking questions? Even though they&#8217;re making statements? And questions tend to go up at the end of the sentence?</p>
<p>Ok, admittedly your dulcet tones tend to be more neutral than most and you have a great &#8220;radio&#8221; voice. But&#8230;..?</p>
<p>Heh heh.</p>
<p>Russell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPN::GDay World &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Russell Hates My Ads</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/comment-page-1/#comment-100708</link>
		<dc:creator>TPN::GDay World &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Russell Hates My Ads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/#comment-100708</guid>
		<description>[...] Russell Buckley hates the GoDaddy ads that Jason Calacanis and I are running. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Russell Buckley hates the GoDaddy ads that Jason Calacanis and I are running. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Reilly</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/comment-page-1/#comment-100707</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/#comment-100707</guid>
		<description>Russell, thanks for the commentary and suggestions. I agree with you. Playing the same ads on every show can get annoying. Radio plays the same ads over and over as well but because they have so many ads, I guess the repetitiveness is less obvious than a podcast that only carries a couple of ads. At this stage we&#039;re hoping that the audience is accepting the premise that we are producing these shows for no money and most of us aren&#039;t gangsta-rapper rich like Jason or Curry or Doug Kaye. 

I would love to find better models, so I&#039;m completely open to feedback, criticism and suggestions! 

Now... on the other hand... 

MY VOICE GOES UP AT THE END??! Get outta here. That is about the worst insult you can make. Tell me my podcasts suck, I&#039;m an idiot, but that?!? I left Queensland 20 years ago mate. I&#039;ve worked hard on my dulcet tones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell, thanks for the commentary and suggestions. I agree with you. Playing the same ads on every show can get annoying. Radio plays the same ads over and over as well but because they have so many ads, I guess the repetitiveness is less obvious than a podcast that only carries a couple of ads. At this stage we&#8217;re hoping that the audience is accepting the premise that we are producing these shows for no money and most of us aren&#8217;t gangsta-rapper rich like Jason or Curry or Doug Kaye. </p>
<p>I would love to find better models, so I&#8217;m completely open to feedback, criticism and suggestions! </p>
<p>Now&#8230; on the other hand&#8230; </p>
<p>MY VOICE GOES UP AT THE END??! Get outta here. That is about the worst insult you can make. Tell me my podcasts suck, I&#8217;m an idiot, but that?!? I left Queensland 20 years ago mate. I&#8217;ve worked hard on my dulcet tones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Cadden</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/comment-page-1/#comment-100706</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Cadden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/#comment-100706</guid>
		<description>I have to think, due to the nature of Podcasts, that it&#039;s got to be VERY similar to a radio advertisement, only it needs to be different for every podcast. Not different indefinitely, but different from the podcast episode immediately preceding it. Thus, if a certain sponsor had 2-3 different ad copies, and rotated them sequentially, or more and rotated them sporadically, it would make a HUGE difference. 

Personally, I also don&#039;t see anything wrong with the talent/host presenting the ad. Depending on the sponsor, I could see that being of more value. For instance, the one radio station that I listen to, the morning show talent usually does the ads, saying they&#039;ve used it and it&#039;s good. Lies or not, (honestly don&#039;t know) it lends more credibility, and makes it easier for me to listen to, cause I&#039;m already prepared to hear their voice. 

The worst ever is to hide them. One radio station here has an advertiser that basically rewrites a song that *would* play on the station with their own lyrics, so you don&#039;t realize it till 10-15 seconds into the song that it&#039;s not really a song at all. Sounds great, but REALLY annoying to me, and makes me have negative feelings once I figure it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to think, due to the nature of Podcasts, that it&#8217;s got to be VERY similar to a radio advertisement, only it needs to be different for every podcast. Not different indefinitely, but different from the podcast episode immediately preceding it. Thus, if a certain sponsor had 2-3 different ad copies, and rotated them sequentially, or more and rotated them sporadically, it would make a HUGE difference. </p>
<p>Personally, I also don&#8217;t see anything wrong with the talent/host presenting the ad. Depending on the sponsor, I could see that being of more value. For instance, the one radio station that I listen to, the morning show talent usually does the ads, saying they&#8217;ve used it and it&#8217;s good. Lies or not, (honestly don&#8217;t know) it lends more credibility, and makes it easier for me to listen to, cause I&#8217;m already prepared to hear their voice. </p>
<p>The worst ever is to hide them. One radio station here has an advertiser that basically rewrites a song that *would* play on the station with their own lyrics, so you don&#8217;t realize it till 10-15 seconds into the song that it&#8217;s not really a song at all. Sounds great, but REALLY annoying to me, and makes me have negative feelings once I figure it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/comment-page-1/#comment-100705</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/#comment-100705</guid>
		<description>Yes, sorry, I trailed off on a podcast tangent there.

Podcasters should avoid presenting ads, in keeping with professional practice elsewhere, and no matter how good a presenting voice they have. 

There needs to be the effect of a distance between presenter and ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, sorry, I trailed off on a podcast tangent there.</p>
<p>Podcasters should avoid presenting ads, in keeping with professional practice elsewhere, and no matter how good a presenting voice they have. </p>
<p>There needs to be the effect of a distance between presenter and ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Buckley</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/comment-page-1/#comment-100704</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/03/13/podcast-advertising-is-truly-awful/#comment-100704</guid>
		<description>Luke - I&#039;d tend to agree generally. But in this case, the guys are already producing great audio content. Well, Cameron&#039;s voice does go up at the end, but that&#039;s coz he&#039;s an Aussie, so I think we can forgive him.

So this isn&#039;t really about whether people should Podcast, but rather if the presenter (or &quot;DJ&quot; using totally outdated parlance) should produce the advertising element.

Russell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke &#8211; I&#8217;d tend to agree generally. But in this case, the guys are already producing great audio content. Well, Cameron&#8217;s voice does go up at the end, but that&#8217;s coz he&#8217;s an Aussie, so I think we can forgive him.</p>
<p>So this isn&#8217;t really about whether people should Podcast, but rather if the presenter (or &#8220;DJ&#8221; using totally outdated parlance) should produce the advertising element.</p>
<p>Russell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

