<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile Web Usage vs. SMS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/</link>
	<description>Russell Buckley and Carlo Longino on mobile technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Salmon</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/comment-page-1/#comment-41174</link>
		<dc:creator>James Salmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/#comment-41174</guid>
		<description>Me thinks SMS remains the most dominant form of mobile data communication cos everyone has got it. We&#039;ve still got a wee while to go until data-plans, j2me, syncml and other innovation ingredients are ubiquitous across the device base. Then...the mobile innovation wave will really hit us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me thinks SMS remains the most dominant form of mobile data communication cos everyone has got it. We&#8217;ve still got a wee while to go until data-plans, j2me, syncml and other innovation ingredients are ubiquitous across the device base. Then&#8230;the mobile innovation wave will really hit us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Buckley</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/comment-page-1/#comment-39866</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 04:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/#comment-39866</guid>
		<description>Tom - you&#039;re showing your age :-) Seriously, look at the way a kid uses sms and &quot;cumbersome&quot; just isn&#039;t an accurate description. Now if you see me using it, it&#039;s spot on, I agree.

Russell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom &#8211; you&#8217;re showing your age <img src='http://mobhappy.com/blog1/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Seriously, look at the way a kid uses sms and &#8220;cumbersome&#8221; just isn&#8217;t an accurate description. Now if you see me using it, it&#8217;s spot on, I agree.</p>
<p>Russell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reno marioni</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/comment-page-1/#comment-39634</link>
		<dc:creator>reno marioni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/#comment-39634</guid>
		<description>While it may be cumbersome, its universal.  The US now does 12.7 Billion SMS per month and Europe is doing 4x that.  It&#039;s a $3B business in the US alone today and $10B in
a couple of years.  Say what you like.....it&#039;s good business and you can express yourself in sms in ways that you could not in voice or even email.  i think forcing people to 160 characters does have some benefits!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it may be cumbersome, its universal.  The US now does 12.7 Billion SMS per month and Europe is doing 4x that.  It&#8217;s a $3B business in the US alone today and $10B in<br />
a couple of years.  Say what you like&#8230;..it&#8217;s good business and you can express yourself in sms in ways that you could not in voice or even email.  i think forcing people to 160 characters does have some benefits!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hume</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/comment-page-1/#comment-39223</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/#comment-39223</guid>
		<description>Weird. I would consider high cost and cumbersome to be good descriptions of SMS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird. I would consider high cost and cumbersome to be good descriptions of SMS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/comment-page-1/#comment-39190</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/#comment-39190</guid>
		<description>&quot;Right on Carlo&quot;
Hmm. Carlo didn&#039;t express any opinion. Irony?

Pricing for data is of course virtual, so that&#039;s easily solved. Operators might not want data to cannibalize voice air time, but that&#039;s another story.

The user experience is a bit harder though.

I still see phones being delivered from branded shops that don&#039;t have everything activated. I don&#039;t understand the rationale in that.

To get users onto the mobile web is of course not just about configuration. Service access needs to be much more in the face and transparent. There has been talks about using the idle screen as a portal for a long time, still I see very little of that except on smartphones and then typically for local phone functions like PIM and other apps.

Also the attitude of operators need to change from &quot;deliver consumer services&quot; to &quot;deliver B2B services to service providers&quot;. Of course on the voice side they own the customer, and that seems to be the mindset also on the service-side, which is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Right on Carlo&#8221;<br />
Hmm. Carlo didn&#8217;t express any opinion. Irony?</p>
<p>Pricing for data is of course virtual, so that&#8217;s easily solved. Operators might not want data to cannibalize voice air time, but that&#8217;s another story.</p>
<p>The user experience is a bit harder though.</p>
<p>I still see phones being delivered from branded shops that don&#8217;t have everything activated. I don&#8217;t understand the rationale in that.</p>
<p>To get users onto the mobile web is of course not just about configuration. Service access needs to be much more in the face and transparent. There has been talks about using the idle screen as a portal for a long time, still I see very little of that except on smartphones and then typically for local phone functions like PIM and other apps.</p>
<p>Also the attitude of operators need to change from &#8220;deliver consumer services&#8221; to &#8220;deliver B2B services to service providers&#8221;. Of course on the voice side they own the customer, and that seems to be the mindset also on the service-side, which is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Hettema</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/comment-page-1/#comment-38992</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Hettema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/10/24/mobile-web-usage-vs-sms/#comment-38992</guid>
		<description>Right on Carlo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Carlo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

