<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wot a Waste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/09/29/wot-a-waste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/09/29/wot-a-waste/</link>
	<description>Russell Buckley and Carlo Longino on mobile technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinu</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/09/29/wot-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-38072</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/09/29/wot-a-waste/#comment-38072</guid>
		<description>I experienced this when i was in the US last 3 years! 60% of my snail mails were junk and I considered myself lucky!

I came back to India and guess what - we thankfully haven&#039;t taken up that legacy. Its just too expensive - that medium financiallY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I experienced this when i was in the US last 3 years! 60% of my snail mails were junk and I considered myself lucky!</p>
<p>I came back to India and guess what &#8211; we thankfully haven&#8217;t taken up that legacy. Its just too expensive &#8211; that medium financiallY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Buckley</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/09/29/wot-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-34124</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/09/29/wot-a-waste/#comment-34124</guid>
		<description>Bernard - thanks for the comment, but you have a serious case of denial, my friend. You clearly have a vested interest in defending this industry, but I&#039;m sorry to tell you it&#039;s going to implode in the next 5 years. 

I&#039;m well aware of how the direct marketing industry works. The fact is to MOST recipients, it&#039;s ALL junk mail most of the time - spam and junk mail is but a matter of perception. So no matter how targeted your list and how relevant you think your message is to your audience, if it gets binned unopened, it&#039;s still junk mail.

Russell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernard &#8211; thanks for the comment, but you have a serious case of denial, my friend. You clearly have a vested interest in defending this industry, but I&#8217;m sorry to tell you it&#8217;s going to implode in the next 5 years. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m well aware of how the direct marketing industry works. The fact is to MOST recipients, it&#8217;s ALL junk mail most of the time &#8211; spam and junk mail is but a matter of perception. So no matter how targeted your list and how relevant you think your message is to your audience, if it gets binned unopened, it&#8217;s still junk mail.</p>
<p>Russell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/09/29/wot-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-34091</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/09/29/wot-a-waste/#comment-34091</guid>
		<description>Wot a rubbish!

Was this article written 10 ears ago?

Because this is where the industry was in the 90`s. In the meantime direct mail (not junk mail) is highly targeted to a responsive audience. 
The mistake here is to confuse junk mail with direct mail.
For all that don`t know the difference: 

Direct Mail is properly addressed with the name and address details and in most cases delivered to a certain target market.

Junk mail is just a piece of paper ddropped or mailed to as many letterboxes as possible. 

Direct mail is far more expensive to produce, so it is in the interest of the mailer to keep costs down and response up.

Junk mail is cheap and therefore used to blanket certain areas, just look at your local supermarkt as the main culprit.

Which one works better? Hard to say, especially since junk mail has no real way of monitoring results.

In the end the customer decides, if enough people react to it, it will go on forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wot a rubbish!</p>
<p>Was this article written 10 ears ago?</p>
<p>Because this is where the industry was in the 90`s. In the meantime direct mail (not junk mail) is highly targeted to a responsive audience.<br />
The mistake here is to confuse junk mail with direct mail.<br />
For all that don`t know the difference: </p>
<p>Direct Mail is properly addressed with the name and address details and in most cases delivered to a certain target market.</p>
<p>Junk mail is just a piece of paper ddropped or mailed to as many letterboxes as possible. </p>
<p>Direct mail is far more expensive to produce, so it is in the interest of the mailer to keep costs down and response up.</p>
<p>Junk mail is cheap and therefore used to blanket certain areas, just look at your local supermarkt as the main culprit.</p>
<p>Which one works better? Hard to say, especially since junk mail has no real way of monitoring results.</p>
<p>In the end the customer decides, if enough people react to it, it will go on forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duzbzwghoyw</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/09/29/wot-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-33947</link>
		<dc:creator>duzbzwghoyw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/09/29/wot-a-waste/#comment-33947</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ctchjsc...&lt;/strong&gt;

wlxcdhfqg ptyuiqfzy wmpqbvyxm mvcetmy ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ctchjsc&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>wlxcdhfqg ptyuiqfzy wmpqbvyxm mvcetmy &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Borg</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/09/29/wot-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-33127</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders Borg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/09/29/wot-a-waste/#comment-33127</guid>
		<description>Can Internet advertising be considered inexpensive (relatively speaking) compared to other means for advertising, if counting the effectivity (however that&#039;s measured)? 

Yet, when it comes to ringtones clearly TV ads have been very effective for some.

Direct Mail seems more like a paper recycling ecosystem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Internet advertising be considered inexpensive (relatively speaking) compared to other means for advertising, if counting the effectivity (however that&#8217;s measured)? </p>
<p>Yet, when it comes to ringtones clearly TV ads have been very effective for some.</p>
<p>Direct Mail seems more like a paper recycling ecosystem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

