Customer Service is an Opportunity, Not a Cost

One of my constant themes here¬†at MobHappy is that any customer interaction is an opportunity. It’s an opportunity to increase satisfaction and loyalty, increase advocacy, increase usage of basic services, encourage usage of more services and ultimately decrease churn. It also makes your marketing costs more efficient as it costs significantly less to maximise revenues from an existing customer than to go out and get a new one.

This should be pretty obvious and I’m clearly not the only one banging this particular drum.

So if you don’t work for an operator (or in any event are¬†very familiar with how they run their businesses), you’ll find this article (registration needed) rather extraordinary. While it’s written by the Marketing Manager of LogicaCMG, who is trying to sell operators systems to help improve customer service, the bald facts can’t be argued with.

Consider:

* Most operator customer service people don’t even¬†have access to basic¬†account information like the¬†the make and model of the phone, when the customer calls. Therefore, the first crucial minutes are spent trying to find that out – that is after you’ve spent time hanging on, inputting your mobile phone number and then having to tell them the phone number when you are put through. Determining the make is pretty easy, but the model number is something else – if you don’t know it, you often have to look in obscure places like under the battery.

If you can’t determine the model, incidentally and the query relates to Internet or MMS¬†settings, as examples, the call is a waste of time and the poor customer service person has about as much chance of solving the problem as reading the answer in tea leaves.

* The CS person has no access to transaction records for the customer. This means that they can’t see what services the customer is using and apply that knowledge to improving usage of the phone or upsell further products and services. “Now Mr Rowehl, I’d like to tell you about this new thing we call ‘text messaging’” “Cool, but I’m finding the WPA support within the wifi stack dodgy. I don’t want to switch to WEP which sucks, so what can you recommend?” “Bleugghhh”.

Logica’s research also points to a worrying trend that the more users try more complex services such as MMS and Internet browsing, the more likely it is that customers will churn. This could be as they’re dissatisfied with the support, but there’s something disarmingly naive about the idea that they might think support will be better elsewhere. Far more likely that as “power” users in the loosest sense, they’re always upgrading and keeping an eye out for better deals.

Having just faced the challenge of moving to a different operator, operating system and far more complex model (Nokia E61), I have to say I’m really struggling with many of the more complex features. Sure I can do the easy stuff like voice, sms, mms, internet browsing, setting up email¬†etc although many of the instructions are not nearly intuitive enough and I had to play with the settings, surprise, surprise. But when it comes like patching through to wifi networks and surfing or VoIP, I’m lost. And just how far do you think the average CS person in an operator is going to help me with that?

—–>Follow us on Twitter too: @russellbuckley and @caaarlo

Share this post:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Yes, we're talking about customer service mysteries seen from the user end of a support call. Why one has to repeat information, entered via IVR on entry, to the agent is beyond me. But no matter.

    Here's another thing service organizations can do to keep the lid on during my call: ask me, on a scale of 1-3, how tech savvy I am. In other words, can you follow a support rep if they use moderately sophisticated, therefore presumably efficient, language? If yes, let's use that language to resolve the support issue, rather than treat everyone who calls as capable of no more than power-cycling the phone. Just a thought. But I do get tired of playing dumb just to satisfy an agent's script.
  • "Most operator customer service people don‚Äôt even have access to basic account information like the the make and model of the phone"

    Interestingly some operators clearly uses such info to figure out what format the phone configuration should be sent in, when the user asks for Data, MMS settings etc. I tried this with Telenor, and it was enough to mention the phone number and the service pulled up my phone model, including a picture of it.

    A slight issue here is that the SIM card (if talking GSM) is not locked to a specific phone and many have pre-paid SIMs, hence a user's phone model may vary over time, but in subscription plans consumers will likely have the same phone model they initially ordered with the SIM (at least as an initial hint), and that information should of course be readily available to customer support.

    Another solution is outlined here:
    http://www.abiro.com/news/2006...
    This would always work, except if the consumer doesn't even know the mobile number.

    Some operators automatically ask for the phone number before getting in touch with a representative. That should be enough to pull up all my info before I speak to someone, but some actually ask for the number again (verbally) as if this system didn't work.

    There seems to be an opportunity for third-party customer support, possibly serving several operators, but the question is who should pay. Would operators be interested in outsourcing their customer support?
  • Russell Buckley
    Nope nothing like the sms thing here, so no idea what it means...

    Russell
  • Go Nokia E61 power! By the way, I was talking to some other E61ers the other day, and we've all seen this phenomenon of the phone asking to send a text message when you put the sim card in. We've seen it on both Cingular and TMo in the US. Have you seen it over there? Where does that message go? Is it an effort to start sending more device info to the carrier for customer support? Is Nokia using it? Things could be trending in the direction of better customer support... I certainly hope so, it's the reason most frequently sighted by carriers when asked why they keep their networks so locked down. Yet whenever I test the quality of their end to end integration I'm left wanting a lot more as well.
blog comments powered by Disqus