<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M:Metrics ‚Äì The Elvis Analysts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/04/07/mmetrics-%e2%80%93-the-elvis-analysts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/04/07/mmetrics-%e2%80%93-the-elvis-analysts/</link>
	<description>Russell Buckley and Carlo Longino on mobile technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/04/07/mmetrics-%e2%80%93-the-elvis-analysts/comment-page-1/#comment-3086</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 19:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/04/07/mmetrics-%e2%80%93-the-elvis-analysts/#comment-3086</guid>
		<description>i work w/ m:metrics a lot.  their data comes from multiple carriers, not just one.  and the carriers themselves will tell you m:metrics agregated data are better than their own.  rest of the data comes from surveys and panels they run - in terms of the validity of those numbers you just need to trust them, like you do neisen, MRI, and the rest.  best part of this is it&#039;s real data - they&#039;ll give you the tables, but make believe nonsense you get from others in the biz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i work w/ m:metrics a lot.  their data comes from multiple carriers, not just one.  and the carriers themselves will tell you m:metrics agregated data are better than their own.  rest of the data comes from surveys and panels they run &#8211; in terms of the validity of those numbers you just need to trust them, like you do neisen, MRI, and the rest.  best part of this is it&#8217;s real data &#8211; they&#8217;ll give you the tables, but make believe nonsense you get from others in the biz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/04/07/mmetrics-%e2%80%93-the-elvis-analysts/comment-page-1/#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 22:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/04/07/mmetrics-%e2%80%93-the-elvis-analysts/#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>What I dont get is how do u certify that M:Metrics is not beefing up the numbers. The credibility done with small set of users or data coming from one carrier obviously does not give you full picture. I have not looked their website yet, but I guess you have to certify numbers saying that they have proof from carriers. 

By the way, expecting much more coverage from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I dont get is how do u certify that M:Metrics is not beefing up the numbers. The credibility done with small set of users or data coming from one carrier obviously does not give you full picture. I have not looked their website yet, but I guess you have to certify numbers saying that they have proof from carriers. </p>
<p>By the way, expecting much more coverage from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

