<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3GSM &#8211; Palm OS Is Dead, Long Live Linux Palm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/02/14/3gsm-palm-os-is-dead-long-live-linux-palm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/02/14/3gsm-palm-os-is-dead-long-live-linux-palm/</link>
	<description>Russell Buckley and Carlo Longino on mobile technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:31:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is Palm OS Done, Linux Or No? at MobHappy</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/02/14/3gsm-palm-os-is-dead-long-live-linux-palm/comment-page-1/#comment-22126</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Palm OS Done, Linux Or No? at MobHappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 07:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/02/14/3gsm-palm-os-is-dead-long-live-linux-palm/#comment-22126</guid>
		<description>[...] Back at 3GSM, Access, the owners of PalmSource, unveiled the new Linux version of Palm OS, which really, at least at that point, had little to do with Palm OS as most people know it. The new Palm OS, labeled the Access Linux Platform, promised to in some way bring the antiquated software up to date, and at the time, the company said it would never bother to release Palm OS 6, which was announced in, oh, February 2004, and was outdated then. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Back at 3GSM, Access, the owners of PalmSource, unveiled the new Linux version of Palm OS, which really, at least at that point, had little to do with Palm OS as most people know it. The new Palm OS, labeled the Access Linux Platform, promised to in some way bring the antiquated software up to date, and at the time, the company said it would never bother to release Palm OS 6, which was announced in, oh, February 2004, and was outdated then. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lifeblog</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/02/14/3gsm-palm-os-is-dead-long-live-linux-palm/comment-page-1/#comment-1957</link>
		<dc:creator>Lifeblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/02/14/3gsm-palm-os-is-dead-long-live-linux-palm/#comment-1957</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Mobhappy on: Palm OS Is Dead, Long Live Linux Palm at MobHappy...&lt;/strong&gt;

I think this officially signals the demise of everything Palm was. I&#039;ve been watching them shoot themselves in the foot over the past few years. It&#039;s been sad to see such a leader basically undo themselves, among many things: buying...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mobhappy on: Palm OS Is Dead, Long Live Linux Palm at MobHappy&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I think this officially signals the demise of everything Palm was. I&#8217;ve been watching them shoot themselves in the foot over the past few years. It&#8217;s been sad to see such a leader basically undo themselves, among many things: buying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
