<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile Music&#8217;s, Um, Big Competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2005/10/13/mobile-musics-um-big-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2005/10/13/mobile-musics-um-big-competition/</link>
	<description>Russell Buckley and Carlo Longino on mobile technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grunyen</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2005/10/13/mobile-musics-um-big-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Grunyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://p6.hostingprod.com/@mobhappy.com/blog1/?p=178#comment-263</guid>
		<description>Surely it would have to work on dials right? One for tuning, one for volume? 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely it would have to work on dials right? One for tuning, one for volume?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Curtis</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2005/10/13/mobile-musics-um-big-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://p6.hostingprod.com/@mobhappy.com/blog1/?p=178#comment-262</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t help feeling that bluetooth control would be a bit a bit dull. Surely someone could invent a more physical and direct control method....actually I think I better stop now. Do you think BT really came up with this? Or did the Sun get BT to endorse an idea its editor had reviewing the next day&#039;s page 3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help feeling that bluetooth control would be a bit a bit dull. Surely someone could invent a more physical and direct control method&#8230;.actually I think I better stop now. Do you think BT really came up with this? Or did the Sun get BT to endorse an idea its editor had reviewing the next day&#8217;s page 3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

